Many technologists lack a clear understanding of what constitutes plagiarism, especially since researching others’ solutions to a technical problem is not only ethical, but also a best practice. While acknowledging that plagiarism varies wildly from person to person and case to case, here’s how Elli Ferguson, a former programmer and principle systems engineer for a major bank, and plagiarism expert and consultant Jonathan Bailey defined it in an email:“When you copy someone’s entire solution, or a significant part of it, and present it as your own, that is generally considered plagiarism, as long as there are other ways that solution could be reached.”
— fire wroteUnfortunately Corpse this is in almost everything in the online era. People are just to lazy, or lack the knowledge to do it themselves. Have seen several 3d modelers retire or go private only for some of the same reasons. In the long run they are cutting their own throats doing what they do, and most of the time you are right, all would be needed is just simple recognition to the original coder, modeler, whatever. Leave the credits in the code, etc etc. But I think their self-esteem is so low they have to do this to make themselves feel worthy of the air that is allotted them to breathe. Try not to let them get to you, they are not worth it.
Regardless of whether or not you can touch the copyrighted work, if it is stored in some permanent (or even semi-permanent) medium that enables copying, accessing or transmission of the work by others, it is considered to be fixed into a tangible medium.This means that the law that was written for books and tapes just as easily applies to the internet and computers. After all, saving a work to a hard drive (either your own or one in the cloud) clearly meets these standards for tangibility.That, in turn, is one of the really good things about The Copyright Act of 1976, it was written to be technology neutral. This means that the act is able to function more than 40 years after it was written and after what is quite possibly the biggest technological revolution in history.Source:Please login to see this linkGet registered or Log in
(d) Fraudulent Removal of Copyright Notice.—Any person who, with fraudulent intent, removes or alters any notice of copyright appearing on a copy of a copyrighted work shall be fined not more than $2,500.(e) False Representation.—Any person who knowingly makes a false representation of a material fact in the application for copyright registration provided for by section 409, or in any written statement filed in connection with the application, shall be fined not more than $2,500.
Under the Berne Convention, everything written is automatically copyrighted from whenever it is put in fixed form. So you don't have to do anything to “get” the copyright on what you write—as long as nobody else can claim to own your work.
The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date.
[you may require] ... preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it
— dirtdog wroteWhat I find amusing about that dude is how he was (when I first ran into that site over there, not sure if he changed it since) appearing to owning/rights to nukescripts/nukesentinel which Bob Marion turned over to Raven in what 2011?
— coRpSE wrote— dirtdog wroteWhat I find amusing about that dude is how he was (when I first ran into that site over there, not sure if he changed it since) appearing to owning/rights to nukescripts/nukesentinel which Bob Marion turned over to Raven in what 2011?I do remember them doing this. I really don't know what's with them.Really, they should just look at the facts and just undo what they did and just take the loss, it sometimes hurts, but when you're in the wrong, no point in making it worse by digging the hole deeper. Screaming louder and stomping feet don't change the facts.
— Lonestar wroteIt is shit like this that makes me want to walk away and just concentrate on WordPress, But then I remember the handful of people that like to still use Nuke, as some of the new CMS/platforms out there can be quite intimidating to some people, This is why I stick around, and coding is something I have always enjoyed doing, My coding evolves every few months, I am sure coRpSE can attest to this fact lol.
— coRpSE wroteOverall, I do agree with a lot of what he says on the fact to only real way to protect the source is to encrypt, but, there's a problem with that.
— EmeraldDragon wroteIf I remembered it right, I think there is a way to protect without having to encrypt. I don't remember where I saw that from, it had been a long while since I saw it. But I am not sure.
— coRpSE wroteThe only way I know of is using something like ioncube, which is an encryption software. I used them a while ago when I made the ShadowGate mod. If there is another way, I love to learn about it, because I really do not want to pay the price of ioncube if I don't have to of if there is a better alternative.
— EmeraldDragon wrote— coRpSE wroteThe only way I know of is using something like ioncube, which is an encryption software. I used them a while ago when I made the ShadowGate mod. If there is another way, I love to learn about it, because I really do not want to pay the price of ioncube if I don't have to of if there is a better alternative. True to that.. If I ever run across it again, and it's FREE I'll be sure to send it your way.
— coRpSE wrote— EmeraldDragon wrote— coRpSE wroteThe only way I know of is using something like ioncube, which is an encryption software. I used them a while ago when I made the ShadowGate mod. If there is another way, I love to learn about it, because I really do not want to pay the price of ioncube if I don't have to of if there is a better alternative. True to that.. If I ever run across it again, and it's FREE I'll be sure to send it your way. You know, Now that I think about it, what you might have seen is a code obfuscator. Granted, for those that don't know much about code and coding, that could work, but, if that was what your thinking about, anyone that knows a bit about coding, can actually get past it relatively easily. But it is a way to protect your coding a little, though I know some will disagree, (have had debates with them before on obfuscation of code).
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT - 7 Hours